Beginner 11 minInterfaces

Compare the frontends for chat

Direct response

For a local LLM, Open WebUI is the default choice: an interface similar to ChatGPT, Ollama connected with a single Docker command, and built-in accounts and roles. LibreChat works well when a team mixes local and cloud providers, AnythingLLM when the goal is querying documents, and SillyTavern for role-playing. Note: Open WebUI’s license is no longer a simple MIT license, and a trademark clause applies beyond 50 users.

Ollama, LM Studio, or llama.cpp can run the model, but none offers the experience of a true multi-user chat with history, documents, and accounts. That's the role of a frontend. This guide compares five open-source interfaces using verifiable criteria: license, authentication, document management, supported providers, and setup effort.

By Mohamed Meguedmi·Update 2026-09-30·Tested on Windows, macOS, and Linux

#What exactly is a frontend?

A frontend is the web or desktop interface that communicates with an inference server: Ollama, LM Studio, llama-server, vLLM, or a cloud API. It handles conversation history, Markdown rendering, accounts, file uploads, and sometimes searching your documents and agents. It doesn't run the model: if the server behind it is stopped or overloaded, the interface can't do anything about it.

The connection point is almost always an OpenAI-compatible API. Ollama exposes its own at http://localhost:11434/v1/ and accepts any dummy key, letting you connect nearly any frontend without specific configuration. Keep this in mind: choosing a frontend does not commit you to a particular engine, and you can change one without rebuilding the other.

#The comparison in one table

The Local AI Kit

Your private ChatGPT, free, on your own machine in an hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • Lifetime updates

The criteria below are what actually determine a deployment: license (it determines commercial use), authentication (it determines sharing), documents (they determine enterprise use), and installation effort. GitHub star counts, recorded on September 30, 2026, measure popularity only, not quality.

Five open-source chat frontends, as of September 30, 2026
FrontendLicenseGitHub starsAccounts and rolesStrengthsInstallation effort
Open WebUIModified BSD license with a trademark clause (see below)approximately 154,000Roles, groups, LDAP, SSO, SCIMNative Ollama, RAG, plugins, offline modeDocker, one command
LibreChatMITapproximately 45,000OAuth2, LDAP, email, administration panelMulti-provider, presets, agentsDocker Compose
AnythingLLMMITapproximately 66,000Multi-utilisateursDocuments, workspaces, agents, desktop appDesktop application or Docker
SillyTavernAGPL-3.0approximately 34,000Primarily for personal useCharacters, lorebooks, fine-tuning settingsNode.js or Docker
Big-AGIMITapproximately 7,000Not very team-orientedPersonas, multi-model Beam, images, voicesWeb application to deploy

#The Open WebUI license: the detail many people get wrong

Many comparisons, including the earlier version of this guide, present Open WebUI as an MIT project. That is no longer accurate. The repository's LICENSE file is a three-clause BSD-style license with an additional fourth clause: it prohibits modifying, removing, or replacing the “Open WebUI” trademark (name, logo, visual identifiers), unless the deployment does not exceed fifty users over thirty rolling days, you have written permission from the rights holder, or you have an enterprise license.

What this changes in practice. Personal use, family, small team: nothing. Deployment for more than fifty users with your own branding (company logo, product name): you need authorization or an enterprise license, or you must keep the branding. Using the interface as-is, with the branding visible, remains possible. If you are considering a large-scale deployment, read the LICENSE file and its history in the repository, and have the person responsible for licensing review it.

!
Don't rely on the MIT mention you'll see elsewhere
Some comparison pages, and even some automatically generated summaries, still claim that the three major frontends are MIT-licensed. Only the repository's LICENSE file is authoritative, and it has changed. Check it as of your deployment date.

#Open WebUI: the default choice with Ollama

Open WebUI describes itself as a self-hosted, extensible AI platform that can run entirely offline, with support for Ollama and OpenAI-compatible APIs. Its main benefit for beginners is the setup: a single Docker command, then a browser. It offers local RAG backed by multiple vector databases, fine-grained role and group management, and enterprise authentication (LDAP, Active Directory, SSO, SCIM).

Run Open WebUI with Ollama on the same machine
docker run -d -p 3000:8080 --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway -v open-webui:/app/backend/data --name open-webui --restart always ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main

Then open http://localhost:3000 and create the first account, which becomes the administrator. If Ollama runs on another server, the README says to set the OLLAMA_BASE_URL variable. The open-webui volume preserves your data: without it, every container recreation erases history and accounts.

Limits to keep in mind: the interface is feature-rich and sometimes complex, each additional function adds configuration and update overhead, and the branding clause described above applies to large deployments.

#LibreChat: multiple providers in one interface

LibreChat targets teams that want a single interface for multiple providers: its repository cites Anthropic, OpenAI, Azure, Groq, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, and Gemini, with presets, an administration panel, and multi-user authentication via OAuth2, LDAP, or email. The project is licensed under the MIT license, with no branding requirement.

Typical case: a team that wants Ollama internally but keeps access to a cloud provider for certain requests, with a single interface and monitored quotas. Tradeoff: deployment uses Docker Compose with multiple services, and the “local-first” approach is less pronounced than with Open WebUI.

#AnythingLLM: when the goal is to talk to your documents

AnythingLLM presents itself as an all-in-one application for chatting with your documents and using agents in a multi-user environment, without extensive configuration. Its strength is its organization into workspaces (one per project, client, or topic) and the availability of a desktop app for Mac, Windows, and Linux: install it like regular software, without Docker. The license is MIT.

Important note: the README states that the application includes a telemetry feature that collects anonymous usage information. If you require strict offline operation or confidentiality in a sensitive environment, disable this collection in the settings before connecting any data, and verify what actually leaves the network.

#SillyTavern: role-playing and fiction

SillyTavern is designed for role-playing and interactive fiction. The repository describes it as a unified interface for numerous LLM APIs (KoboldAI/CPP, Horde, NovelAI, Ooba, Tabby, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Claude, Mistral and others), with visual novel mode, lorebooks (WorldInfo), image generation, speech synthesis, and third-party extensions. It is licensed under AGPL-3.0, which is more restrictive for use as a service.

It isn’t intended to replace a professional chat tool: the interface is dense and character-oriented, not designed for business accounts. For professional use, rule it out. For creative writing with fine-grained sampling controls, it’s the most complete option.

#Big-AGI: multi-model productivity

Big-AGI is a self-hosted AI suite under the MIT license. Its repository highlights personas, multi-model Beam conversations, image generation, voice, PDF import, and on-premises deployment. With around 7,000 GitHub stars, its community is significantly smaller than Open WebUI's or AnythingLLM's: expect fewer tutorials, fewer ready-made answers when something goes wrong, and greater reliance on a small number of maintainers.

#What no frontend can fix: concurrent users

Opening the interface to five colleagues does not make the machine five times more capable. Each frontend sends its requests to the same engine, which processes them. According to the Ollama FAQ, a model processes one request at a time by default (OLLAMA_NUM_PARALLEL is 1); subsequent requests are queued, up to 512 by default, and then rejected.

Enabling parallelism has a direct memory cost. The documentation states that the required memory grows as the product of the number of parallel requests and the context length: a context of 2,000 tokens with 4 parallel requests allocates the equivalent of 8,000 tokens. For a model with 27 billion parameters that is already close to the card’s limit, parallelism can overflow memory and offload part of the model to the CPU, slowing everyone down.

Effect of parallelism on memory (documentation rule Ollama)
Context per requestParallel requestsTotal allocated contextWhat this means
4,000 tokens14 000Default configuration, the most economical
4,000 tokens416 000Four times more context memory
32,000 tokens4128 000Reserved for machines with substantial memory

The practical rule: size the engine before the interface. For more than a few active users at the same time, a server designed for throughput, such as vLLM or SGLang, can usefully replace Ollama behind the same frontend, since they all speak the same OpenAI-compatible API.

#Which frontend for which profile

The frontend for your situation
Your situationRecommended choiceWhyWhat to check
You’re getting started, with Ollama already installedOpen WebUIOne Docker command, familiar interfaceThe trademark clause if you exceed 50 users
Team mixing local and cloudLibreChatMulti-provider, MIT, administrationDocker Compose deployment time
Chat over a document databaseAnythingLLMWorkspaces, desktop applicationTelemetry to disable
Roleplay and creative writingSillyTavernCharacters, lorebooks, samplingThe AGPL-3.0 license if you offer it as a service
Personal use with several models side by sideBig-AGIMulti-model Beam, personasCommunity size

#Before opening it to other people

A frontend that works on your workstation isn't ready to serve a team. Three checks are essential before sharing the address. First: enable authentication and disable open registration; otherwise, anyone on the network can create an account. Second: put the service behind an HTTPS reverse proxy, especially if traffic leaves the local network. Third: never expose the engine's port directly (11434 for Ollama), which has no built-in authentication.

These points are covered in detail in the security and network-sharing guides. If you are the only user on a machine, the frontend does not need all this, but getting into the habit of checking what is listening on the network is worthwhile from the start.

#Test a frontend in thirty minutes

  1. 01
    Connect the Engine
    Launch the frontend and point it to your engine using the OpenAI-compatible URL. Verify that a simple conversation works before changing any other settings.
  2. 02
    Send a real document
    Upload a PDF about your work—not a demo example—and ask three questions whose answers you know.
  3. 03
    Create a second account
    Test registration, roles, and access to another user’s conversations: this is where frontends differ most.
  4. 04
    Monitor the network
    Monitor the application’s outbound connections during a conversation. Nothing should be sent to a service you did not choose.
  5. 05
    Decide
    Keep the one whose output is reliable, whose license suits your use case, and that you’ll be able to update six months from now.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best frontend for Ollama?+
Open WebUI is the simplest to set up: one Docker command, an interface similar to ChatGPT, built-in RAG and account management. The alternatives make sense for specific needs: LibreChat for combining multiple providers, AnythingLLM for documents, and SillyTavern for fiction. Without a specific need, start with Open WebUI.
Is Open WebUI really free and open source?+
The code is public and free to use, but its license is no longer a simple MIT license: it adds a clause prohibiting the removal or replacement of the Open WebUI brand beyond fifty users over thirty days, unless authorized or covered by an enterprise license. For personal use or a small team, this changes nothing.
Do you need Docker to install a chat frontend?+
Not always. AnythingLLM offers a desktop application that installs like ordinary software. Open WebUI and LibreChat most often use Docker, which isolates the installation and simplifies updates. Without Docker, you have to manage the dependencies yourself, which takes more time and breaks more easily.
How do I connect my frontend to Ollama?+
Ollama exposes an OpenAI-compatible API on http://localhost:11434/v1/ and accepts a dummy key. In a Docker container, localhost refers to the container: use host.docker.internal as in the official Open WebUI command, or the machine's IP address, and verify that the port isn't publicly exposed.
Can I share a frontend with my team?+
Yes, but enable authentication before sharing the address, disable open registration, and use HTTPS behind a reverse proxy. Open WebUI and LibreChat provide accounts, roles, and LDAP or OAuth sign-in. Also make sure the server has enough memory for simultaneous requests before inviting everyone.
Do frontends send my data outside?+
They send your queries to the configured API: with Ollama running locally, nothing leaves your machine. But some add their own data collection: AnythingLLM reports anonymous usage telemetry. Consult the documentation, disable anything unnecessary, and in a sensitive environment, control outbound traffic with a firewall.
Did this guide help you?

Feedback, an error, or a clarification? Let us know—it improves the guide for everyone.