Intermediate 11 minMacBook Pro

Which LLM on MacBook Pro M4 Pro / Max (24–128 GB) ?

Direct response

A MacBook Pro with an M4 Pro or Max easily runs 14B to 32B models and, with an M4 Max with 64 or 128 GB, a 70B in Q4 (about 40 GB). Bandwidth (273, 410, or 546 GB/s depending on the chip) caps a 70B at about 13 to 14 tokens per second; memory, from 24 to 128 GB, determines the model size.

The M4 MacBook Pro is the best laptop for large local models, provided you choose the right chip and memory. This page shows which configuration matches which model size, calculates the maximum theoretical speed, and compares the machine with a NVIDIA GPU, a Mac Studio, or an Air.

Choosing a machine? Our picks by budget →

By Mohamed Meguedmi·Update 2026-09-29·Tested on macOS 14+
Recommended hardware

Buying alternative for this guide: GMKtec EVO-X2 64GB / 1TB (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

A mini PC is a complete machine: check the available memory and engine compatibility. It does not replace macOS/MLX or CUDA.

Why this choice? Our complete guide on GMKtec EVO-X2 64GB / 1TB (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) →

Compare all options by budget, from €800 to €3,500 →

On the go: which laptop for local AI →

Affiliate links — possible commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, BestLLMfor earns from qualifying purchases.

#MacBook Pro M4 Pro and M4 Max: which configurations, and what bandwidth

On a MacBook Pro M4, the chip determines two things: bandwidth, which determines maximum generation speed, and maximum memory, which determines model size. According to the Apple technical specifications, the M4 Pro offers 273 GB/s, the M4 Max with 14 CPU cores and 32 GPU cores offers 410 GB/s, and the M4 Max with 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores offers 546 GB/s. Memory ranges from 24 GB to 128 GB depending on the chip. These are not interchangeable options: each chip opens up its own class of models.

MacBook Pro M4 Pro and M4 Max configurations, based on Apple
ChipBandwidthMemory availableRealistic model class (Q4)
M4 Pro273 GB/s24 or 48 GBUp to 14B comfortably, 24–27B with 48 GB
M4 Max, 14 CPU cores, 32 GPU cores410 GB/s36 GB24–27B comfortable, 32B with a short context
M4 Max, 16 CPU cores, 40 GPU cores546 GB/s48, 64, or 128 GB32B comfortably; 70B from 64 GB; MoE models over 100B with 128 GB

Apple specifies that the M4 Max supports up to 128 GB of unified memory and that this allows developers to interact with language models of nearly 200 billion parameters. Apple specifies neither the quantization nor the context for this figure: do not read it as a promise for a dense Q4 model, since a dense 70B already weighs approximately 40 GB according to the site's benchmarks.

The specification describes the 14-inch MacBook Pro; the 16-inch model uses the same chips. The M4 chips have since been followed by an M5 generation: new units are no longer always available in the generation described here, and the used market determines its price. This page cites no prices; the /materiel-ia/macbook-pro-m4-max page provides up-to-date benchmarks.

#Pro, Max 14, or Max 16 cores: how to choose

The Mac Kit

Local AI on your Mac, done right: the models that fit your unified memory, MLX vs Ollama vs LM Studio, and the settings that make Apple Silicon fast.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • Lifetime updates
  1. 01
    Set your target model size first
    An 8- to 14-billion-parameter model runs on an M4 Pro with 24 GB. A 24B to 32B model requires 36 to 48 GB. A 70B requires at least 64 GB, with a short context.
  2. 02
    Add context and a 25 to 30% margin
    The KV cache grows with context length, and macOS reserves some memory for itself. Multiply the model size by about 1.3 for a cautious estimate.
  3. 03
    Check bandwidth against the desired speed
    Divide bandwidth by model size: that is the theoretical maximum speed. If it is too low for your use case, upgrade the chip rather than the memory.
  4. 04
    Choose between a Max chip with 14 or 16 cores
    The 16-core model delivers 546 GB/s versus 410 GB/s, and, above all, access to 48, 64, and 128 GB: memory, as much as speed, justifies the difference.

This procedure explains why the M4 Pro with 48 GB and the 14-core M4 Max with 36 GB are not comparable: the former offers more memory, while the latter offers more bandwidth. For workloads where the model is small and responses need to be fast, the 14-core Max wins. To load a larger model, the 48 GB Pro wins, at the cost of slower generation.

#What bandwidth allows: theoretical ceilings

Each generated token rereads the active weights. Maximum speed is therefore bandwidth divided by weight in gigabytes, using the site's reference points: 14B about 9 GB, 32B about 19 to 20 GB, 70B about 40 GB in Q4. The table applies this formula to the three chips. These are calculated ceilings, never measurements: actual speed depends on the engine, context, and thermal load.

Theoretical generation ceiling (Q4 weights): calculation, not measurement
Dense modelWeightsM4 Pro (273 GB/s)M4 Max 14 cores (410 GB/s)M4 Max 16 cores (546 GB/s)
14B≈ 9 GB≈ 30 tok/s≈ 45 tok/s≈ 60 tok/s
32B≈ 19 to 20 GB≈ 14 tok/s≈ 21 tok/s≈ 28 tok/s
70B≈ 40 GBout of reach (memory)out of reach (memory)≈ 13 to 14 tok/s

Mixture-of-experts (MoE) models are a different case: a 30B model with 3B active parameters takes about 19 GB of memory but reads only a few gigabytes of weights per token, so its ceiling is several times higher than that of a dense 32B model of the same weight. It’s the best deal for a MacBook Pro with 48 GB or more. Check actual throughput on /benchmarks or in third-party benchmarks, verifying the chip, quantization, and engine.

!
Beware throughput figures without context
A reported throughput above 30 tokens per second for a dense 32B model in Q4 on an M4 Max at 546 GB/s exceeds the theoretical ceiling of 28: it doesn't come from standard generation. Always check which model is active, which quantization is being used, and whether a draft model is accelerating generation.

#MLX, Ollama, LM Studio: which engine on this machine

Ollama covers the essentials: one-click installation, local API, automatic GPU detection. MLX, Apple's framework, leverages the Mac's shared memory without copying between CPU and GPU; its mlx-lm package lets you generate text and fine-tune models on Apple silicon, with support for quantized models. LM Studio provides a graphical interface and MLX models. The comparative guide to MLX versus llama.cpp settles the performance question; there's no need to repeat its conclusions here.

  1. 01
    Install Ollama
    Download it from ollama.com or with Homebrew. Automatic startup is described in the macOS installation guide.
  2. 02
    Launch the selected model
    The ollama run t command downloads and then runs the model. Then check the GPU with ollama ps.
  3. 03
    Configure the KV cache and flash attention
    Ollama automatically enables flash attention when the hardware supports it; the OLLAMA_KV_CACHE_TYPE variable quantizes the KV cache, with f16 as the default. It reduces the memory used by long contexts.
  4. 04
    Increase the GPU memory limit if necessary
    The mlx-lm repository indicates that a model that fits in RAM can often be accelerated by raising the system's wired memory limit. This is an administrator-level system setting: follow the procedure in the macOS optimization guide, without copying a value found elsewhere.
Terminal
brew install --cask ollama
ollama run qwen3:32b
ollama ps

# Long contexte : cache KV quantifié
export OLLAMA_FLASH_ATTENTION=1
export OLLAMA_KV_CACHE_TYPE=q8_0

#Long context: the use case where the Pro’s memory matters most

Long context is the main reason to choose 64 and 128 GB. Ollama sets a default context of 4 000 tokens under 24 GiB of memory, 32 000 between 24 and 48 GiB, and 256 000 starting at 48 GiB; its documentation recommends at least 64 000 tokens for web research, agents, and coding tools. A context of 64 000 tokens on a 32B model costs gigabytes of KV cache, in addition to the 19 to 20 GB of weights: on 48 GB, the headroom disappears quickly. A 64 GB or 128 GB machine leaves room for this context without requiring cache quantization.

#MacBook Pro M4 versus a NVIDIA GPU, a Mac Studio, or an Air

The useful comparison is memory before speed. A RTX 4090 comes with 24 GB of GDDR6X, according to NVIDIA: beyond a model with 24 to 30 billion parameters, it must offload part of the model to system RAM, and speed drops. A MacBook Pro M4 Max with 64 or 128 GB can load a full 70B model. The card remains superior when the model fits in its memory and speed is the priority.

Where the MacBook Pro M4 fits among the other options
SituationBest optionReason
8B to 14B model, portability, quiet operationMacBook Air M4 16 or 24 GBSufficient, lighter
24B to 32B model, several open modelsMacBook Pro M4 Pro 48 GB or MaxMemory and active cooling
70B model or very long context, on the moveMacBook Pro M4 Max 64 or 128 GBOnly laptop capable of loading an entire 70B model
Same workload, but at the officeMac Studio or Mac miniSame chip, larger cooling system, no battery
Model that fits in 24 GB, maximum speedGPU NVIDIA with 24 GB or moreHigher bandwidth when the model fits

#M4 or M5: what the next generation changes

Apple has since released MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips. Their specifications list 307 GB/s for the M5 Pro, 460 GB/s for the M5 Max with 32 GPU cores, and 614 GB/s for the M5 Max with 40 GPU cores, versus 273, 410, and 546 GB/s for the M4 generation. Bandwidth increases by about 12 to 13%, so theoretical speed ceilings do too. The buying decision mainly comes down to equal memory: a used M4 Max with 128 GB opens up more models than a new M5 Pro with 48 GB.

Bandwidth of Pro and Max chips, M4 and M5, according to Apple
ChipM4M5
Pro273 GB/s307 GB/s
Max, 32 GPU cores410 GB/s460 GB/s
Max, 40 GPU cores546 GB/s614 GB/s

#Limitations to know

Memory ceiling
Up to 128 GB. Beyond that, you need a Mac Studio or another platform.
No CUDA
Libraries that require CUDA do not run. MLX and llama.cpp cover inference, not the entire training ecosystem.
Fine-tuning
MLX supports low-rank and full fine-tuning with quantized models. On models with more than a few billion parameters, this remains slow and generates heat: reserve large workloads for a cloud service.
Battery
Continuous inference quickly drains the battery: plug in for long sessions.

#Frequently asked questions

FAQ
Is the MacBook Pro M4 Max better than a RTX 4090 for LLMs?+
It all depends on the model size. The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of memory; beyond that, it offloads to RAM and slows down. An M4 Max with 64 or 128 GB can load an entire 70B model but generates more slowly than a card when the model fits in its 24 GB. Choose based on the model size you are targeting.
M4 Pro 48 GB or M4 Max 36 GB: which should you choose?+
The M4 Pro 48 GB loads larger models, up to a 32B model in Q4 with a moderate context. The M4 Max 14-core has 410 GB/s versus 273, so it generates about 50% faster, but its 36 GB limits the size. For a 24–32B model, memory comes first: get 48 GB.
Do you need 64 or 128 GB of memory on an M4 Max?+
64 GB is enough for a 70B in Q4 (about 40 GB) with a moderate context. 128 GB is justified for a very long context, models with experts exceeding 100 billion parameters, or several models loaded at the same time. If your use fits within 64 GB, the extra capacity does not add speed.
What throughput can you expect from a 70B model on a MacBook Pro M4 Max?+
The theoretical ceiling is 546 GB/s divided by approximately 40 GB, or 13 to 14 tokens per second. Actual speed is lower and depends on the engine and context. The M4 Max at 410 GB/s and 36 GB cannot load a 70B model; only the 546 GB/s version with 64 or 128 GB can.
Can you fine-tune a model on a MacBook Pro M4?+
Yes, with MLX: the mlx-lm package supports low-rank and full fine-tuning with quantized models. In practice, this works well for small models and experiments. For a model with several tens of billions of parameters, a cloud service remains faster.
Ollama, LM Studio, or MLX on a MacBook Pro M4?+
Ollama for simplicity and the local API, LM Studio for the graphical interface, and MLX for Apple formats and fine-tuning. All three can coexist, but don't load two large models at the same time: memory is the first bottleneck. The MLX vs. llama.cpp guide compares speeds.
Did this guide help you?

Feedback, an error, or a clarification? Let us know—it improves the guide for everyone.