Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3.5 9B vs Qwen 3 8B

Qwen 3.5 9BvsQwen 3 8B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3.5 9B (9B parameters, Alibaba) and Qwen 3 8B (8B, Alibaba). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3.5 9B Qwen 3 8B
Settings 9B 8B
Family Qwen Qwen
Author Alibaba Alibaba
Origin CN CN
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Context 262,000 tokens 131,072 tokens
Output April 2025 April 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3.5 9B Qwen 3 8B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 6 GB 5 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 7 GB 6 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 10 GB 9 GB
FP16 (max quality) 18 GB 16 GB
CPU-only RAM 12 GB 10 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3.5 9B Qwen 3 8B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 75 tok/s · FP16 90 tok/s · FP16
RTX 4080 (16 GB) 28 tok/s · Q8 35 tok/s · FP16
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) 9 tok/s · Q8 12 tok/s · Q8
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 28 tok/s · FP16 35 tok/s · FP16

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Lightweight deployment
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 9B

Qwen 3.5 9B

Next-generation dense 9B. 262k ctx, improved hybrid thinking.

  • 262k native context in 9B
  • Toggleable thinking mode
  • Strong multilingual support
  • Apache 2.0
  • Fine-tuning ecosystem less mature than Qwen 2.5

Installation

ollama run qwen3.5:9b
Alibaba · 8B

Qwen 3 8B

Hybrid thinking/fast mode. 119 languages, 32k native (131k via YaRN).

  • Toggleable thinking mode
  • 119 languages
  • 131k ctx (with YaRN)
  • Apache 2.0
  • Verbose thinking mode
  • Less mature than Qwen 2.5 in terms of ecosystem

Installation

ollama run qwen3:8b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3.5 9B or Qwen 3 8B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3.5 9B runs at FP16 (~75 tok/s), Qwen 3 8B at FP16 (~90 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 3 8B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Qwen 3 8B fits in 5 GB versus 6 GB for its rival — a 1 GB gap, significant if you're targeting an RTX 3060 or a 4060 Ti 8 GB.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3.5 9B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Qwen 3 8B is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 8B (8B). More capable: Qwen 3.5 9B (9B). If you're unsure, run the configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further