Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B vs. Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B

Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3BvsNemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B (30B parameters, Alibaba) and Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B (30B, NVIDIA). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data — no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B
Settings 30B 30B
Family Qwen Nemotron
Author Alibaba NVIDIA
Origin CN US
License Apache 2.0 NVIDIA Open Model License
Context 262,144 tokens 1,000,000 tokens
Output May 2025 May 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 19 GB 19 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 23 GB 23 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 35 GB 35 GB
FP16 (max quality) 62 GB 62 GB
CPU-only RAM 32 GB 32 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 100 tok/s · Q5_K_M 100 tok/s · Q5_K_M
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 40 tok/s · Q8 40 tok/s · Q8

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B wins. Explicit-reasoning model (chain-of-thought), better for math and logic problems.
Vision / image
Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B wins. Natively supports image inputs.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 30B

Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B

Vision MoE with 30B/3B active. Vision sweet spot Qwen 3. 256k ctx.

  • 262k multimodal context
  • 19 GB VRAM Q4
  • Efficient MoE
  • Apache 2.0
  • Worse vision than the 235B
  • Fewer fine-tunes than Qwen2-VL

Installation

ollama run qwen3-vl:30b
NVIDIA · 30B

Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B

Hybrid Mamba-2 + Transformer MoE with 30B/3B active parameters. 1M ctx. 4× the throughput of Nemotron 2.

  • 1 million tokens of native context
  • Ultra-efficient MoE (3B active)
  • NVIDIA Open Model License
  • 1M ctx uses a lot of VRAM if fully utilized

Installation

ollama run nemotron3:30b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B or Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B runs at Q5_K_M (~100 tok/s), Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B in Q5_K_M (~100 tok/s). In pure throughput, Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

Both require the same VRAM in Q4 (19 GB). The choice then comes down to the license or perceived quality.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Nemotron Nano 3 30B-A3B is under the NVIDIA Open Model License—also check the terms. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B (30B). More capable: Qwen 3 VL 30B-A3B (30B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further