Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 8B vs Gemma 3 12B

Qwen 3 8BvsGemma 3 12B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 8B (8B parameters, Alibaba) and Gemma 3 12B (12B, Google). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 8B Gemma 3 12B
Settings 8B 12B
Family Qwen Gemma
Author Alibaba Google
Origin CN US
License Apache 2.0 Gemma
Context 131,072 tokens 128,000 tokens
Output April 2025 March 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 8B Gemma 3 12B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 5 GB 7 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 6 GB 9 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 9 GB 13 GB
FP16 (max quality) 16 GB 24 GB
CPU-only RAM 10 GB 14 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 8B Gemma 3 12B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 90 tok/s · FP16 60 tok/s · FP16
RTX 4080 (16 GB) 35 tok/s · FP16 22 tok/s · Q8
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) 12 tok/s · Q8 7 tok/s · Q5_K_M
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 35 tok/s · FP16 22 tok/s · FP16

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Qwen 3 8B wins. Explicit-reasoning model (chain-of-thought), better for math and logic problems.
Vision / image
Gemma 3 12B wins. Natively supports image inputs.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Lightweight deployment
Qwen 3 8B wins. Lighter (8B parameters), runs on modest configurations.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 8B

Qwen 3 8B

Hybrid thinking/fast mode. 119 languages, 32k native (131k via YaRN).

  • Toggleable thinking mode
  • 119 languages
  • 131k ctx (with YaRN)
  • Apache 2.0
  • Verbose thinking mode
  • Less mature than Qwen 2.5 in terms of ecosystem

Installation

ollama run qwen3:8b
Google · 12B

Gemma 3 12B

Multimodal sweet spot. 128k ctx, vision, 140 languages.

  • Multimodal sweet spot
  • 128k ctx
  • 140 languages
  • License Gemma
  • 9 GB RAM minimum for Ollama

Installation

ollama run gemma3:12b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 8B or Gemma 3 12B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 8B runs at FP16 (~90 tok/s), Gemma 3 12B in FP16 (~60 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 3 8B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Qwen 3 8B fits in 5 GB versus 7 GB for its rival—a 2 GB difference, significant if you're targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 8B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Gemma 3 12B is under Gemma — also check the terms. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 8B (8B). More capable: Gemma 3 12B (12B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further