Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 30B-A3B vs Qwen 3 32B

Qwen 3 30B-A3BvsQwen 3 32B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B parameters, Alibaba) and Qwen 3 32B (32B, Alibaba). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data — no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 30B-A3B Qwen 3 32B
Settings 30B 32B
Family Qwen Qwen
Author Alibaba Alibaba
Origin CN CN
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Context 131,072 tokens 131,072 tokens
Output April 2025 April 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 30B-A3B Qwen 3 32B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 19 GB 19 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 23 GB 23 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 35 GB 35 GB
FP16 (max quality) 62 GB 64 GB
CPU-only RAM 32 GB 32 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 30B-A3B Qwen 3 32B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 100 tok/s · Q5_K_M 30 tok/s · Q5_K_M
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 40 tok/s · Q8 12 tok/s · Q8

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 30B

Qwen 3 30B-A3B

MoE 30B/3B active hybrid thinking. MMLU 81.4, AIME24 80.4. 100+ languages.

  • Fast thanks to the 3B active parameters
  • MMLU 81.4
  • AIME24 80.4
  • Apache 2.0
  • 19 GB in Q4

Installation

ollama run qwen3:30b-a3b
Alibaba · 32B

Qwen 3 32B

Dense 32B with thinking mode. MMLU-Pro 65.5, SuperGPQA 39.8.

  • Solid reasoning in thinking mode
  • 131k ctx
  • Apache 2.0
  • Worse than QwQ-32B dedicated to pure reasoning

Installation

ollama run qwen3:32b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 30B-A3B or Qwen 3 32B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 30B-A3B runs at Q5_K_M (~100 tok/s), Qwen 3 32B in Q5_K_M (~30 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 3 30B-A3B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

Both require the same VRAM in Q4 (19 GB). The choice then comes down to the license or perceived quality.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 30B-A3B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Qwen 3 32B is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B). More capable: Qwen 3 32B (32B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further