Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 30B-A3B vs. Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B

Qwen 3 30B-A3BvsGranite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B parameters, Alibaba) and Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B (32B, IBM). VRAM required by quantization, tokens/second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 30B-A3B Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B
Settings 30B 32B
Family Qwen Granite
Author Alibaba IBM
Origin CN US
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Context 131,072 tokens 128,000 tokens
Output April 2025 October 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 30B-A3B Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 19 GB 19 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 23 GB 23 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 35 GB 35 GB
FP16 (max quality) 62 GB 64 GB
CPU-only RAM 32 GB 32 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 30B-A3B Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 100 tok/s · Q5_K_M 75 tok/s · Q5_K_M
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 40 tok/s · Q8 30 tok/s · Q8

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Qwen 3 30B-A3B wins. Explicit-reasoning model (chain-of-thought), better for math and logic problems.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 30B

Qwen 3 30B-A3B

MoE 30B/3B active hybrid thinking. MMLU 81.4, AIME24 80.4. 100+ languages.

  • Fast thanks to the 3B active parameters
  • MMLU 81.4
  • AIME24 80.4
  • Apache 2.0
  • 19 GB in Q4

Installation

ollama run qwen3:30b-a3b
IBM · 32B

Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B

Mamba-2 + MoE 32B/9B hybrid. ~70% less RAM in long contexts. Apache 2.0.

  • 70% less RAM in long-context workloads
  • Apache 2.0
  • Enterprise-ready
  • Recent llama.cpp support required

Installation

ollama run granite4:small-h

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 30B-A3B or Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 30B-A3B runs at Q5_K_M (~100 tok/s), Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B in Q5_K_M (~75 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 3 30B-A3B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

Both require the same VRAM in Q4 (19 GB). The choice then comes down to the license or perceived quality.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 30B-A3B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B). More capable: Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B (32B). If you're unsure, run the configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further