Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 30B-A3B vs. ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking

Qwen 3 30B-A3BvsERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B parameters, Alibaba) and ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking (21B, Baidu). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, and installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 30B-A3B ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking
Settings 30B 21B
Family Qwen ERNIE
Author Alibaba Baidu
Origin CN CN
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Context 131,072 tokens 131,072 tokens
Output April 2025 April 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 30B-A3B ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 19 GB 13 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 23 GB 16 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 35 GB 23 GB
FP16 (max quality) 62 GB 42 GB
CPU-only RAM 32 GB 18 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 30B-A3B ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 100 tok/s · Q5_K_M 100 tok/s · Q8
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy 40 tok/s · Q5_K_M
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 40 tok/s · Q8 40 tok/s · Q8

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Qwen 3 30B-A3B wins. Best capacity-to-constraints ratio for this use case.
Reasoning / math
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
RAG / long documents
Qwen 3 30B-A3B wins. Larger context window (131,072 tokens), suitable for long documents.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 30B

Qwen 3 30B-A3B

MoE 30B/3B active hybrid thinking. MMLU 81.4, AIME24 80.4. 100+ languages.

  • Fast thanks to the 3B active parameters
  • MMLU 81.4
  • AIME24 80.4
  • Apache 2.0
  • 19 GB in Q4

Installation

ollama run qwen3:30b-a3b
Baidu · 21B

ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking

Compact MoE reasoner, 21B/3B active. Apache 2.0. Fast thanks to 3B active.

  • 13 GB VRAM Q4
  • Compact MoE reasoning
  • Strong in Chinese
  • Less multilingual than Qwen
  • Baidu license to verify

Installation

ollama pull hf.co/baidu/ernie-4.5-21b-GGUF

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 30B-A3B or ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 30B-A3B runs at Q5_K_M (~100 tok/s), ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking in Q8 (~100 tok/s). In pure throughput, ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking fits in 13 GB versus 19 GB for its rival—a 6 GB gap, significant if you are targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 30B-A3B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: ERNIE 4.5 21B-A3B Thinking (21B). More capable: Qwen 3 30B-A3B (30B). If you're unsure, run the configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further