Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 14B vs. Qwen 3 8B

Qwen 3 14BvsQwen 3 8B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 14B (14B parameters, Alibaba) and Qwen 3 8B (8B, Alibaba). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 14B Qwen 3 8B
Settings 14B 8B
Family Qwen Qwen
Author Alibaba Alibaba
Origin CN CN
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Context 131,072 tokens 131,072 tokens
Output April 2025 April 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 14B Qwen 3 8B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 9 GB 5 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 11 GB 6 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 16 GB 9 GB
FP16 (max quality) 28 GB 16 GB
CPU-only RAM 16 GB 10 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 14B Qwen 3 8B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 55 tok/s · Q8 90 tok/s · FP16
RTX 4080 (16 GB) 20 tok/s · Q8 35 tok/s · FP16
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) 6 tok/s · Q5_K_M 12 tok/s · Q8
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 20 tok/s · FP16 35 tok/s · FP16

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Lightweight deployment
Qwen 3 8B wins. Lighter (8B parameters), runs on modest configurations.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 14B

Qwen 3 14B

Dense 14B with hybrid thinking. Equals Qwen 2.5 32B Based on STEM/code.

  • Dense 14B matching Qwen 2.5 32B Base
  • Hybrid thinking
  • 131k ctx
  • Not yet at the level of specialized reasoners on AIME

Installation

ollama run qwen3:14b
Alibaba · 8B

Qwen 3 8B

Hybrid thinking/fast mode. 119 languages, 32k native (131k via YaRN).

  • Toggleable thinking mode
  • 119 languages
  • 131k ctx (with YaRN)
  • Apache 2.0
  • Verbose thinking mode
  • Less mature than Qwen 2.5 in terms of ecosystem

Installation

ollama run qwen3:8b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs better on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 14B or Qwen 3 8B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 14B runs at Q8 (~55 tok/s), Qwen 3 8B in FP16 (~90 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 3 8B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Qwen 3 8B fits in 5 GB versus 9 GB for its rival—a 4 GB difference, significant if you are targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 14B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Qwen 3 8B is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 3 8B (8B). More capable: Qwen 3 14B (14B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further