Home › Comparison tool › Qwen 3 14B vs Gemma 3 12B

Qwen 3 14BvsGemma 3 12B

Complete comparison between Qwen 3 14B (14B parameters, Alibaba) and Gemma 3 12B (12B, Google). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Qwen 3 14B Gemma 3 12B
Settings 14B 12B
Family Qwen Gemma
Author Alibaba Google
Origin CN US
License Apache 2.0 Gemma
Context 131,072 tokens 128,000 tokens
Output April 2025 March 2025

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Qwen 3 14B Gemma 3 12B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 9 GB 7 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 11 GB 9 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 16 GB 13 GB
FP16 (max quality) 28 GB 24 GB
CPU-only RAM 16 GB 14 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Qwen 3 14B Gemma 3 12B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) 55 tok/s · Q8 60 tok/s · FP16
RTX 4080 (16 GB) 20 tok/s · Q8 22 tok/s · Q8
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) 6 tok/s · Q5_K_M 7 tok/s · Q5_K_M
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 20 tok/s · FP16 22 tok/s · FP16

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Reasoning / math
Qwen 3 14B wins. Explicit-reasoning model (chain-of-thought), better for math and logic problems.
Vision / image
Gemma 3 12B wins. Natively supports image inputs.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • Refunded within 30 days

Strengths and weaknesses

Alibaba · 14B

Qwen 3 14B

Dense 14B with hybrid thinking. Equals Qwen 2.5 32B Based on STEM/code.

  • Dense 14B matching Qwen 2.5 32B Base
  • Hybrid thinking
  • 131k ctx
  • Not yet at the level of specialized reasoners on AIME

Installation

ollama run qwen3:14b
Google · 12B

Gemma 3 12B

Multimodal sweet spot. 128k ctx, vision, 140 languages.

  • Multimodal sweet spot
  • 128k ctx
  • 140 languages
  • License Gemma
  • 9 GB RAM minimum for Ollama

Installation

ollama run gemma3:12b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Qwen 3 14B or Gemma 3 12B?

On an RTX 4090, Qwen 3 14B runs at Q8 (~55 tok/s), Gemma 3 12B in FP16 (~60 tok/s). In pure throughput, Gemma 3 12B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Gemma 3 12B fits in 7 GB versus 9 GB for its rival—a 2 GB difference, significant if you're targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Qwen 3 14B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Gemma 3 12B is under Gemma — also check the terms. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Gemma 3 12B (12B). More capable: Qwen 3 14B (14B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further