Home › Comparison tool › Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3.1 70B

Mixtral 8x7BvsLlama 3.1 70B

Complete comparison between Mixtral 8x7B (47B parameters, Mistral AI) and Llama 3.1 70B (70B, Meta). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, use-case verdict, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Mixtral 8x7B Llama 3.1 70B
Settings 47B 70B
Family Mistral Llama
Author Mistral AI Meta
Origin FR US
License Apache 2.0 Llama 3 Community
Context 32 768 tokens 131,072 tokens
Output December 2023 July 2024

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Mixtral 8x7B Llama 3.1 70B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 26 GB 40 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 32 GB 48 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 50 GB 75 GB
FP16 (max quality) 94 GB 140 GB
CPU-only RAM 48 GB 64 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Mixtral 8x7B Llama 3.1 70B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy ✗ too heavy
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) 12 tok/s · Q5_K_M ✗ too heavy

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Formal French
Mixtral 8x7B wins. Trained on a dense French-language corpus, better at idiomatic phrasing.
RAG / long documents
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
Agents & tool use
Close match — it depends on the exact use case. The two are equivalent on this criterion; decide based on your VRAM or licensing constraints.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Mistral AI · 47B

Mixtral 8x7B

8-expert MoE. High quality, but VRAM-hungry.

  • Quality far above the size ratio
  • 32k context
  • Completely free Apache 2.0
  • Very good at coding and multilingual tasks
  • 26 GB VRAM Q4 (like a dense 47B model)
  • Outpaced by Qwen 3 and Llama 3.3 in 2025

Installation

ollama run mixtral:8x7b
Meta · 70B

Llama 3.1 70B

The in-house GPT-4. Reserved for serious rigs (2×3090 mini).

  • Open-weight quality benchmark
  • 128k context
  • Very good at reasoning
  • 40 GB of VRAM in Q4 (2×3090 minimum)
  • Restricted commercial license >700M MAU

Installation

ollama run llama3.1:70b

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Mixtral 8x7B or Llama 3.1 70B?

On a RTX 4090, Mixtral 8x7B does not fit in 24 GB—you need to offload part of it to the CPU; Llama 3.1 70B does not fit in 24 GB either. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Mixtral 8x7B or Llama 3.1 70B: which is better in French?

For formal French (writing, summarization, translation), Mixtral 8x7B has the edge—trained on a dense French-language corpus. The other remains usable, but for less demanding use cases.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Mixtral 8x7B fits in 26 GB versus 40 GB for its rival—a 14 GB gap, significant if you are targeting an RTX 3060 or a 4060 Ti 8 GB.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Mixtral 8x7B is under Apache 2.0 — free for commercial use. Llama 3.1 70B is under Llama 3 Community — also check the terms. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Mixtral 8x7B (47B). More capable: Llama 3.1 70B (70B). If you are unsure, run the configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further