Llama 3.2 Vision 11BvsQwen 2 VL 7B
Complete comparison between Llama 3.2 Vision 11B (11B parameters, Meta) and Qwen 2 VL 7B (7B, Alibaba). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.
In brief
| Feature | Llama 3.2 Vision 11B | Qwen 2 VL 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Settings | 11B | 7B |
| Family | Llama | Qwen |
| Author | Meta | Alibaba |
| Origin | US | CN |
| License | Llama 3 Community | Apache 2.0 |
| Context | 131,072 tokens | 32 768 tokens |
| Output | September 2024 | October 2024 |
Memory footprint
Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.
| Quantization | Llama 3.2 Vision 11B | Qwen 2 VL 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M (lightweight) | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Q5_K_M (balanced) | 10 GB | 7 GB |
| Q8 (near-lossless) | 14 GB | 10 GB |
| FP16 (max quality) | 24 GB | 18 GB |
| CPU-only RAM | 14 GB | 10 GB |
Estimated speed (tokens/second)
Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.
| Reference GPU | Llama 3.2 Vision 11B | Qwen 2 VL 7B |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 (24 GB) | 55 tok/s · FP16 | 60 tok/s · FP16 |
| RTX 4080 (16 GB) | 22 tok/s · Q8 | 25 tok/s · Q8 |
| RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) | 6 tok/s · Q5_K_M | 8 tok/s · Q8 |
| Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) | 22 tok/s · FP16 | 25 tok/s · FP16 |
Verdict by use case
For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.
Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.
- Lifetime online access
- PDF + files
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Strengths and weaknesses
Llama 3.2 Vision 11B
Reads images, describes them, performs light OCR, and analyzes charts.
- 128k text context + images
- Meta community license
- Very good OCR and image description
- Vision quality surpassed by Qwen2-VL and LLaVA-OneVision
Installation
Qwen 2 VL 7B
Top-tier vision. Excellent multilingual OCR.
- Dynamic resolution (20px to 16K)
- Excellent OCR and documents
- Apache 2.0
- Video supported
- 32k context only (text+image)
- Not as capable as Qwen3-VL
Installation
Frequently asked questions
Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Llama 3.2 Vision 11B or Qwen 2 VL 7B?
On an RTX 4090, Llama 3.2 Vision 11B runs at FP16 (~55 tok/s), Qwen 2 VL 7B in FP16 (~60 tok/s). In pure throughput, Qwen 2 VL 7B wins. See the configurator to test your exact GPU.
Which uses the least VRAM?
In Q4_K_M, Qwen 2 VL 7B fits in 6 GB versus 8 GB for its rival—a 2 GB difference, significant if you're targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.
Can these models be used in commercial production?
Llama 3.2 Vision 11B is under Llama 3 Community—check the restrictions, especially the monthly user thresholds. Qwen 2 VL 7B is under Apache 2.0 — also free to use. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.
Which one should you choose in 2026?
Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Qwen 2 VL 7B (7B). More capable: Llama 3.2 Vision 11B (11B). If you're unsure, run the configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.
Alternatives to consider
If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.