Home › Comparison tool › Llama 4 Scout 109B vs Gemma 4 2B

Llama 4 Scout 109BvsGemma 4 2B

Complete comparison between Llama 4 Scout 109B (109B parameters, Meta) and Gemma 4 2B (2B, Google). VRAM required by quantization, tokens per second measured on 4 reference GPUs, verdict by use case, license, installation commands. All figures are calculated from catalog data—no copy-pasting between pages.

In brief

Feature Llama 4 Scout 109B Gemma 4 2B
Settings 109B 2B
Family Llama Gemma
Author Meta Google
Origin US US
License Llama 4 Community Gemma
Context 10,000,000 tokens 128,000 tokens
Output April 2025 May 6, 2026

Memory footprint

Approximate VRAM required for inference with an average context window. The winner (in green) is the model that uses less — smaller models have the edge.

Quantization Llama 4 Scout 109B Gemma 4 2B
Q4_K_M (lightweight) 65 GB 1.2 GB
Q5_K_M (balanced) 78 GB 1.4 GB
Q8 (near-lossless) 117 GB 2.1 GB
FP16 (max quality) 218 GB 4 GB
CPU-only RAM 100 GB 2.6 GB

Estimated speed (tokens/second)

Estimates based on the best quantization that can fit on each GPU. Actual figures depend on the prompt, context, and engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, MLX). Methodology.

Reference GPU Llama 4 Scout 109B Gemma 4 2B
RTX 4090 (24 GB) ✗ too heavy 200 tok/s · FP16
RTX 4080 (16 GB) ✗ too heavy 100 tok/s · FP16
RTX 3060 12GB (12 GB) ✗ too heavy 35 tok/s · FP16
Apple M4 Pro (48 GB) (36 GB) ✗ too heavy 100 tok/s · FP16

Verdict by use case

For each common use case, we indicate which of the two is better suited based on its tags, size, and specialization.

General chat
Llama 4 Scout 109B wins. Best capacity-to-constraints ratio for this use case.
Vision / image
Llama 4 Scout 109B wins. Natively supports image inputs.
RAG / long documents
Llama 4 Scout 109B wins. Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens), suitable for long documents.
Agents & tool use
Llama 4 Scout 109B wins. Best at tool use and following multi-step instructions.
Lightweight deployment
Gemma 4 2B wins. Lighter (2B parameters), runs on modest configurations.
The Local AI Kit

Your private, free ChatGPT on your machine in 1 hour — LM Studio, Ollama, Open WebUI, your documents, no cloud.

  • Lifetime online access
  • PDF + files
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Strengths and weaknesses

Meta · 109B

Llama 4 Scout 109B

109B/17B active MoE, native multimodal, 10M context. Fits on an H100. HF gated.

  • 10M context (!)
  • Fits on an H100
  • Native vision
  • HF gated
  • Llama 4 license (clause >700M MAU)

Installation

ollama run llama4:scout
Google · 2B

Gemma 4 2B

Gemma 4 base 2B multimodal (text+image), Gemma license, 128k ctx. Runs on an integrated GPU or Raspberry Pi 5. Released May 2026.

  • Fits on integrated GPU (1.2 GB Q4 VRAM)
  • Text + image multimodal
  • License Gemma
  • 128k context on 2B
  • Limited reasoning vs. 4B/26B
  • Gated model on Hugging Face (click-through)

Installation

ollama run gemma4

Frequently asked questions

Which model runs best on RTX 4090 (24 GB): Llama 4 Scout 109B or Gemma 4 2B?

On an RTX 4090, Llama 4 Scout 109B does not fit in 24 GB — part of it must be offloaded to the CPU, Gemma 4 2B in FP16 (~200 tok/s). Check the configurator to test your exact GPU.

Which uses the least VRAM?

In Q4_K_M, Gemma 4 2B fits in 1.2 GB versus 65 GB for its rival—a 63.8 GB gap, significant if you're targeting an RTX 3060 or an 8 GB 4060 Ti.

Can these models be used in commercial production?

Llama 4 Scout 109B is under Llama 4 Community — check the restrictions (especially the monthly user thresholds). Gemma 4 2B is under Gemma — also check the terms. For SaaS, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT.

Which one should you choose in 2026?

Depends on your primary constraint. Smaller / faster: Gemma 4 2B (2B). More capable: Llama 4 Scout 109B (109B). If you're unsure, run it configurator with your GPU and use case — it will decide based on both.

Alternatives to consider

If neither works for you, here are some neighboring models you could explore.

Go further