Head to head
Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B vs LLaDA 2.0 Uni 16B
Side-by-side specs, benchmarks, and a verdict by use case.
| Spec | Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B | LLaDA 2.0 Uni 16B |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 32B | 16B |
| Author | IBM | Ant Group / inclusionAI |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Context window | 0k | 0k |
| VRAM at Q4 | 19 GB | 18 GB |
| VRAM at Q5 | 23 GB | 22 GB |
| VRAM at Q8 | 35 GB | 30 GB |
| VRAM at FP16 | 64 GB | 47 GB |
| Use cases | chat, general, moe | chat, vision, general, moe |
Verdict
Granite 4.0 H-Small 32B-A9B is significantly larger (32B vs 16B), so expect higher quality but heavier VRAM and slower throughput.