GPU Price Watch for Local LLM — June 2026
Last updated 2026-08-07
Street prices, VRAM per dollar, and the three cards actually worth buying this month for local inference.
By Mohamed Meguedmi · 8 min read
Key Takeaways
- The used RTX 3090 (24 GB) is still the value king at roughly $700–$900 street. Nothing new touches its VRAM-per-dollar for 32B-class models.
- AMD's RX 7900 XTX at ~$899 is the best new 24 GB card per dollar — but only if you accept the ROCm software tax.
- The RTX 5090 is the only sane single-card 70B option, but scarcity keeps it at $3,600–$4,300 versus its $1,999 MSRP.
- The RTX 4090 is discontinued and climbing (~$2,755 and rising). Do not pay new-card money for a card you can replace with a used 3090 pair.
- Buy for VRAM first, bandwidth second, TOPS last. A model that fits entirely in VRAM on a slow card beats a fast card that spills to system RAM.
Prices in this watch are US street prices observed the week of June 20, 2026, cross-checked against retail listings and used-market medians. They move weekly — treat them as a snapshot, not a contract. If you want the live figures behind these tables, they are available through our public API (CC BY 4.0) and the open-source BestLLMfor MCP server, so you can pull current VRAM-per-dollar numbers straight into your own tooling.
The June 2026 Price Snapshot
Here is the full board, cheapest VRAM first. The $/GB column is the one that should drive most buying decisions for local inference — it tells you how much you pay for the single resource that decides whether a model runs at all.
| GPU | VRAM | Bandwidth | Street price (USD) | $/GB VRAM | Sensible target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3060 12GB | 12 GB | 360 GB/s | $300 | $25 | 7B–13B at Q4 |
| RTX 3070 | 8 GB | 448 GB/s | $212 | $27 | 7B (tight) |
| RTX 3080 | 10 GB | 760 GB/s | $322 | $32 | 7B, fast |
| RTX 4070 Ti | 12 GB | 504 GB/s | $497 | $41 | 13B at Q4 |
| RTX 3090 (used) | 24 GB | 936 GB/s | ~$750 | $31 | 32B at Q4 |
| RX 7900 XTX | 24 GB | 960 GB/s | $899 | $37 | 32B at Q4 |
| RTX 5080 | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | ~$1,450 | $91 | 13B–32B (tight) |
| RTX 4090 (used, discontinued) | 24 GB | 1008 GB/s | ~$2,755 | $115 | 32B fast / 70B (paired) |
| RTX 5090 | 32 GB | 1792 GB/s | $3,600–$4,300 | ~$122 | 70B at Q4, single card |
Two things jump out. First, the entire bottom third of the table — the 3090, 7900 XTX, and 3080 — clusters around $30/GB, and everything above it more than triples that. Second, the 5090's headline bandwidth of 1,792 GB/s is genuinely in a different class, but you pay for it four times over per gigabyte.
VRAM Is the Only Spec That Matters First
The single most common and most expensive mistake is buying for raw speed. A model either fits in VRAM or it does not. When it does not, layers spill to system RAM over PCIe and throughput collapses by an order of magnitude — the fast card you paid a premium for now crawls.
Concretely, at Q4_K_M quantization the rough VRAM budgets are: a 7B model needs ~5–6 GB, a 13B needs ~9–10 GB, a 32B needs ~20–22 GB, and a 70B needs ~42–48 GB. Add 1–3 GB for context (KV cache) on top, scaling with sequence length. That is why 24 GB is the magic number in June 2026: it is the smallest amount that holds a full 32B model — such as Qwen3-Coder 32B Q4_K_M — entirely on-card with room for a useful context window. You can confirm the file sizes yourself on the Qwen model cards and pull ready-made quants from the Ollama library.
Only after a model fits does bandwidth take over, because token generation is memory-bound: tokens-per-second scales almost linearly with GB/s once the weights are resident. That is the whole reason the 3090 and 4090 remain relevant years after launch — 900+ GB/s of bandwidth ages far better than compute does for inference. For the underlying reason, the llama.cpp project documents how quantized inference is bottlenecked on memory throughput, not FLOPs.
Best Value by Budget Tier
Match your budget to the largest model you actually intend to run. Buying more card than your target model needs is wasted money; buying less means the model never fits.
| Budget | Pick | Largest comfortable model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $350 | RTX 3060 12GB | 13B Q4 | Cheapest 12 GB card; the true entry point for local LLMs. |
| $700–$900 | Used RTX 3090 | 32B Q4 | Best VRAM-per-dollar on the market. The default recommendation. |
| $900 (new only) | RX 7900 XTX | 32B Q4 | Best new 24 GB card if you refuse used and accept ROCm. |
| $1,400–$1,600 | 2× used RTX 3090 | 70B Q4 | Two 3090s beat one 5090 on price and match it on total VRAM. |
| $3,600+ | RTX 5090 | 70B Q4, single card | Only pick if you need single-card simplicity or 1,792 GB/s. |
The pattern is clear: two used 3090s (48 GB total for ~$1,500) undercut a single 5090 (32 GB for ~$3,900) while giving you more aggregate VRAM. The 5090 wins only on power draw, PCIe slot count, and the convenience of not managing a multi-GPU split — real advantages, but ones most individuals do not need. You can model the trade against your token volume in our cost calculator.
NVIDIA vs AMD in June 2026
AMD's RX 7900 XTX at $899 is, on paper, the best new-card deal here: 24 GB and 960 GB/s for less than half a new 4090. ROCm 7.2 has genuinely closed much of the usability gap, and llama.cpp plus vLLM both run well on it today.
The honest verdict: if you want zero-friction tooling, buy NVIDIA. If you want the most VRAM per new dollar and will spend an afternoon on ROCm setup, the 7900 XTX is the smart contrarian buy.
CUDA is still the default target for nearly every quantization tool, fine-tuning script, and community how-to. That ecosystem lead is why a used 3090 at ~$750 often beats a new 7900 XTX at $899 for most readers: it is cheaper, has near-identical bandwidth, and never asks you to debug a runtime. AMD earns its place for buyers who specifically want a warranty and a new card. See our full model-by-hardware pairings in the catalog.
What's Moving the Market This Month
Three forces explain every number in the snapshot table:
- 5090 scarcity. Demand from AI buyers keeps the 5090 at $3,600–$4,300 against a $1,999 MSRP — an 80–115% premium that shows no sign of normalizing while 32 GB single cards stay rare.
- 4090 discontinuation. With production ended, used 4090s have inverted the normal depreciation curve and now trade near $2,755 and climbing. It is now a collector-priced card, not a value one.
- 3090 supply. A steady stream of used 3090s from gaming upgrades keeps the 24 GB tier liquid and cheap. This is the single most important fact for budget-conscious local LLM buyers in mid-2026.
The takeaway: the sweet spot is not moving up-market. If anything, the value case for last-generation 24 GB silicon has strengthened as new-card prices detach from MSRP.
How to Match a GPU to Your Model
- Pick the model and quant first. Decide on, say, Qwen3-Coder 32B at Q4_K_M or Llama-3.3 70B at Q4 before looking at hardware.
- Look up the file size. Check the model card on Hugging Face or the Ollama library page for the exact GGUF size.
- Add a context margin. Budget an extra 1–3 GB for the KV cache, more for long contexts (32K+).
- Choose the cheapest card that clears that total. Use the $/GB column above — do not overbuy.
- Only then compare bandwidth between the cards that fit, to estimate tokens per second.
Follow that order and you will never make Elias's mistake — returning a fast card with too little memory and settling for a used 3090 that runs the 32B model he wanted at full speed. Our benchmark hub lists measured tokens-per-second per card so you can size expectations before you buy.
FAQ
Is a used RTX 3090 still worth buying in mid-2026?
Yes. At roughly $700–$900 it remains the best VRAM-per-dollar option for 32B-class models, with 24 GB and 936 GB/s of bandwidth. Nothing new at its price matches it. Buy from a seller who allows testing, and check for fan and thermal-pad wear.
Why is the RTX 5090 so much more expensive than its MSRP?
AI demand for 32 GB single cards outstrips supply, so street prices sit at $3,600–$4,300 versus a $1,999 MSRP. Unless you specifically need single-card 70B inference or 1,792 GB/s of bandwidth, two used 3090s deliver more total VRAM for less.
Should I buy AMD (RX 7900 XTX) or NVIDIA for local LLMs?
Buy NVIDIA for the frictionless CUDA ecosystem. Buy the 7900 XTX ($899) only if you want the most VRAM per new dollar and are comfortable configuring ROCm 7.2. For most readers a used 3090 is cheaper and simpler.
How much VRAM do I need for a 70B model?
About 42–48 GB at Q4_K_M, plus context. That means a single RTX 5090 (32 GB) is tight and usually needs a lower quant, while two 24 GB cards (48 GB total) run it comfortably.
Is the RTX 4090 a good buy now that it's discontinued?
No. At ~$2,755 and rising it is priced like a collectible. You get the same 24 GB and near-identical bandwidth from a used 3090 for a quarter of the price.
Verdict
The market has not changed the answer it has been giving all year: buy 24 GB, buy used, buy a 3090. New silicon is detaching from MSRP while last-gen cards stay cheap and plentiful, which only strengthens the value case for the mid-tier.
| If you want… | Buy | Approx. cost |
|---|---|---|
| The cheapest way to run any local LLM | RTX 3060 12GB | $300 |
| The best overall value (our pick) | Used RTX 3090 | ~$750 |
| Best new 24 GB card per dollar | RX 7900 XTX | $899 |
| 70B on the cheapest hardware | 2× used RTX 3090 | ~$1,500 |
| Single-card 70B, no compromises | RTX 5090 | $3,600–$4,300 |
Prices will move again next month; the framework will not. Fit the model in VRAM first, then chase bandwidth, and ignore the halo cards unless single-slot simplicity is worth a 4× premium to you. For live figures, our rankings and public data feeds stay current between editions of this watch.
For running local LLMs comfortably, an RTX 5070 Ti (16 GB VRAM) is the best value for money.
Amazon Check RTX 5070 Ti price →As an Amazon Associate, BestLLMfor earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. It does not influence our independent rankings.